Why white balancing in your camera, may be a bad idea.

I receive lot´s of questions on white balancing. Most people are staggered , when I tell them: “Don´t even think of touching that button”. Here is why.

White Balancing was introduced to video cameras (imagine Trailer VO voice) in a world where Da Vinci was considered an Italian painter and Red Giant a tomato brand. At a time when color correction or grading for most ENG or documentary material wasn’t even an option. So it was necessary to get it right in the camera while shooting. This was later brought over to consumer camcorders.

As most convenient things, WB comes with a trade off and that is noise, especially in the blue channel – which is the noisiest anyway.

If you shoot under tungsten the WB (manual or automatic) tries to fight the warm, orange light by raising the gain in the blue channel a few db- and there comes the noise.

Usually camcorders have at least 3 settings. 3200k or Tungsten, 5600 k or daylight and a button for manual WB. 3200k raises the blue gain to compensate for the warmish tones in household bulbs, if you use the manual WB and a white/gray card it is even more aggressive – hence even more blue noise.

This tests where made with a HVX 200 under a 60 watt tungsten bulb. The results are similar in all video cameras, except maybe the ARRI Alexa, which has a surprisingly clean blue channel . Maybe ARRI is lowering the red gain instead of raising the blue, which would make much more sense (but that was only a prototype, so who knows).

The first 4 pictures show the effect of the different WB options.

Here are the blue channels. As you can see, the manual WB and the 3200k settings are the ones which introduce the most noise, especially in the shadows of course.
If you leave the setting to 5600k you get a much cleaner picture, but it has a very warm tone, not what everybody always wants.

And here comes the interesting part. If you lower the red levels in post, instead of raising the blue in camera and then push the exposure a bit, you get a nicer, sharper and cleaner overall picture.

So don´t even think about touching that button (unless you don´t have the time or nerves to do at least a one-light color grading in post).

By the way, COLORISTA II, just released from Red Giant and their color guru Stu Maschwitz, has a very nifty white balance tool, that does not only affect the highlights, but the whole picture.

Frank Glencairn


9 thoughts on “Why white balancing in your camera, may be a bad idea.

  1. Just some typos:
    “rising the blue” s/b “raising the blue”

    “and than push” s/b “and then push”

    “about to touch that button” s/b “about touching that button”

    Great content! Thanks.

    Feel free to not post this reply and simply fix the typos.

  2. Thanks a lot for that. It was really informative, the grain in the manual white balance and 3200k preset are quite astounding. I suppose this applies to the DVX100 as well? I’ll give this a go on my DVX100, it gives me a reason to use Apple’s Color to colour correct my footage =D.

  3. 1.shoot with your daylight preset (5600 k)
    2 WB in post

    Most color correction programs have a eyedropper for this purpose.
    Take the eyedropper and click on something that should be white in real life.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s